Yet I'm observing a huge difference in performance between qBittorrent/uTorrent clients. I'm not an expert, but my basic understanding of torrents suggests that the client I'm using shouldn't matter at all, if I'm using the same tracker. I've tried all of the usual tips you find when googling "why is qBittorrent slow", which is mainly: disabling all limits, trying just TCP instead of TCP+uCP, etc. And there are *way* more torrents which fail to complete, like 30-40% are stalled. So far with qBittorrent, I'm lucky to get 1MB/s download, and then only if I have 50+ simultaneous downloads (for some reason none of the downloads goes very fast, whereas with uTorrent individual torrents would often hit 1MB/s or more). I've been downloading obscure music from the same tracker for years, so I have a good idea of what "normal" looks like with uTorrent: 4MB/s download (with 10-20 downloads active at once), and maybe 15-20% of torrents don't have enough seeds to complete. be Deluge, qBittorrent, rTorrent, Transmission, uTorrent (current), uTorrent 2.2.1. for some reason it's not working that well! Specifically, the download speed is really low, and many torrents aren't completing. Ive been using mileyu0027s voice best torrent clinet reddit mean. However, when it comes to actually downloading the torrents.
It feels like the obviously-superior piece of software. Sorry, this post was deleted by the person who originally posted it. I *love* how responsive and non-bloated qBittorrent is compared to uTorrent, it's fantastic. 2022 - deluge vs qbittorrent for fast, aggressive seeding.
0 kommentar(er)
